Good COP, bad COP: Will Paris climate summit prevail

A bird flies in front of the Eiffel Tower ,which remained closed on the first of three days of national mourning, in Paris, Sunday, Nov. 15, 2015

A bird flies in front of the Eiffel Tower ,which remained closed on the first of three days of national mourning, in Paris, Sunday, Nov. 15, 2015


“Copenhagen”. The mere mention of the Danish capital’s name can send a chill down the spine of even the toughest climate negotiator.

It was there in December 2009 that high hopes for a legal pact to curb climate-harming greenhouse gases came crashing down as diplomacy foundered in extra time.

Now, six years later, 195 nations will try again, this time in Paris.

Much has changed in the climate arena since 2009, and observers say there is reason to be hopeful that negotiators may finally seal some sort of deal.

“The world has learned some valuable lessons from the experience in Copenhagen,” former US vice president turned climate activist Al Gore told AFP.

When leaders failed to reach consensus six years ago, a handful among them — representing key players such as the United States, European Union, Japan, China, India and Brazil — huddled together to thrash out a face-saving “accord”.

Instead of ratifying it, shell-shocked delegates simply “took note” of the non-binding document — an event French President Francois Hollande remembered this week as “an immense failure”.

To avoid a repeat, summit host France has opted to leave heads of state out of the nitty-gritty haggling over text.

Instead, they will give back-to-back speeches on the first day of the November 30-December 11 marathon, seeking to imbue it with a sense of mission.

‘Small text’

Bureaucrats who have been hammering out a blueprint for the last six years will take a final stab at drafting, and then leave it to ministers to seal the deal.

Another change is that delegates to the 21st annual Conference of Parties (COP 21) in Paris will work with a much slimmer draft, weighing in at 55 pages.

“This is the first time before a COP that we have such a small text. Before Copenhagen we had 300” pages, France’s climate negotiator Laurence Tubiana said.

The risk has come into sharper focus as scientific evidence has accumulated since 2009 of mankind’s devastating impact on Earth’s climate system.

At the same time, many now argue that shifting away from climate-harming fossil fuel makes not only environmental but also economic sense.

“The cost of solar power has halved since 2010 and renewables are increasingly cost competitive or even cheaper than carbon-intensive fuels,” said World Resources Institute climate expert Jennifer Morgan.

And on a political level, observers say Paris has more buy-in.

In the build-up, some 170 nations responsible for more than 90 percent of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have submitted carbon-curbing pledges.

They include number one and two polluters China and the United States — both perceived as a drag on the Copenhagen process. This time, they have joined forces to become the engine of COP21.

Everyone’s talking

According to Japanese negotiator Aya Yoshida, the level of mutual trust ahead of Paris is “far, far better”.

“At least we have a talking turn, we know what the others are thinking about,” she told AFP. “We have much more informal meetings, we have much more conversations.”

Some things, however, have not changed since Copenhagen.

Rich and developing nations are still at odds about how to divvy up responsibility for emissions cuts, and who should pay.

“I’ve seen this movie,” Venezuelan negotiator Claudia Salerno warned at a combative meeting last month, where developing nations accused rich ones of using “apartheid” tactics to wipe their core demands off the table.


[wpResize]





    Putin sends S-400 missiles to Syria to deter Turkey
    Thai summit to spotlight Myanmar, Bangladesh over migrant crisis

    Comments

    comments

    %d bloggers like this:
    Powered by : © 2014 Systron Micronix :: Leaders in Web Hosting. All rights reserved

    | About Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Disclaimer | Contact Us |